------- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2005-07-08 00:41 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Casts in folding *& omitted
gcc2eran at tromer dot org wrote: > And here is what N1124 [6.3.2.1/1] says: > "When an object is said to have a particular type, the type is > specified by the lvalue used to designate the object." > See my point? In the C99 standard, 6.5.4 Cast Operators, Footnote 85 "A cast does not yield an lvalue. Thus, a cast to a qualified type has the same effect as a cast to the unqualified version of the type." -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21568