------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2005-07-14 15:24
-------
IMHO either we want to just force what must have default visibility to have
the default visibility (in mt_allocator.h case it is _S_get_pool), as in:
--- ext/mt_allocator.h 2005-05-20 03:36:29.000000000 +0200
+++ ext/mt_allocator.h 2005-07-14 17:17:49.000000000 +0200
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ namespace __gnu_cxx
struct _M_rebind
{ typedef __common_pool_policy<_PoolTp1, _Thread1> other; };
- static pool_type&
+ static __attribute__((visibility ("default"))) pool_type&
_S_get_pool()
{
static pool_type _S_pool;
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ namespace __gnu_cxx
struct _M_rebind
{ typedef __common_pool_policy<_PoolTp1, _Thread1> other; };
- static pool_type&
+ static __attribute__((visibility ("default"))) pool_type&
_S_get_pool()
{
static pool_type _S_pool;
@@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ namespace __gnu_cxx
struct _M_rebind
{ typedef __per_type_pool_policy<_Tp1, _PoolTp1, _Thread1> other; };
- static pool_type&
+ static __attribute__((visibility ("default"))) pool_type&
_S_get_pool()
{
// Sane defaults for the _PoolTp.
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ namespace __gnu_cxx
struct _M_rebind
{ typedef __per_type_pool_policy<_Tp1, _PoolTp1, _Thread1> other; };
- static pool_type&
+ static __attribute__((visibility ("default"))) pool_type&
_S_get_pool()
{
// Sane defaults for the _PoolTp.
(of course together with a libstdc++-v3/configure check for visibility
attribute and using a macro for that, __gxx_default_visibility or something
like that).
Not sure what other places in libstdc++-v3 headers rely on having the default
visibility.
Alternatively, we claim that all of libstdc++-v3 header stuff (or most of it)
needs default visibility and add
#pragma GCC visibility push(default) ... #pragma GCC visibility pop
markers around (most of) libstdc++-v3 headers, like it has been already
added for libsupc++ headers. This wasn't possible earlier when we had the
16 GCC visibility pragmas stacking limit, but now that it is gone, we can
fix that up. Of course the issues Roger raised need to be solved as well.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22482
