------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-15 00:30 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] libgcj build fails with "execvp: /bin/sh: Argument list too long"
bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14 > 08:55 ------- > Adding Mark so that he can judge the opportunity of a backport. > > Removing bug 21624 dependency, because it is indeed fixed on mainline. If bug > 21624 were fixed the command line could be even shorter, but the current > situation on mainline is enough. I think it would be good to backport this patch, as bootstrap breakage is obviously severe. However, I wouldn't want to force the Java people to do something they don't think is safe. As long as the Java people are comfortable with the backport, it's fine by me. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20155