------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-07-20 19:11 ------- Subject: Re: Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
On Jul 20, 2005, at 3:03 PM, schlie at comcast dot net wrote: > - given that 4.1's front end has already evolved from that in 2.95, > it's not clear that a conclusion based on 2.95 is even valid for > 4.1. > (so should no likely assumed as being so). It still is true since the front-end still does exactly what it did in 2.95 for this testcase and there have been no changes in this area really. Since the mainline is in stage3 which means no more improvements except for fixing bugs which are either regressions or non enhancement bugs. -- Pinski -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131