------- Additional Comments From trt at acm dot org 2005-07-28 19:27 ------- In what sense is this bug "invalid"? The comment I noted in c-typeck.c does not match the current implementation, so one or both of those must be incorrect.
Older versions of gcc issued a warning for "*p++;" and so should newer versions. Yes it has a side-effect of increasing p by sizeof(int), but that is not a reason to suppress the warning, it is the reason that the warning should be issued! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23113
