------- Additional Comments From schwinge-bugzilla-gcc dot gnu dot org at 
nic-nac-project dot de  2005-08-01 11:07 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> So, GNU does not follow IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004?

We do follow IEEE Std 1003.1, 2004 here, the standard does not mandate that
PATH_MAX _must_ be defined.
If no limit exist on how long a file name can be, then one does not need to
define PATH_MAX.
And this is the case for the GNU system.

See also here: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21706


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23065
  • [Bug fortr... schwinge-bugzilla-gcc dot gnu dot org at nic-nac-project dot de
    • [Bug ... kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • [Bug ... pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • [Bug ... ams at gnu dot org
    • [Bug ... sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
    • [Bug ... ams at gnu dot org
    • [Bug ... pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
    • [Bug ... Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
    • [Bug ... cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • [Bug ... cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
    • [Bug ... tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply via email to