------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-08-02 03:25 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-02 > 00:42 ------- > Actually the PR 21828 was orginally about stabs and not about dwarf-2: > "When using gdb-309 and gdb-370 on MacOS X 10.3.9, even the simplest queries > seem broken." so > really PR 21828 should never been closed until the stabs problem was fixed. Then the test case in the PR (which you provided) should not have used DWARF-2. I rely on the bugmasters to reduce bugs -- and they do a great job. In any case, the problem is now either in the C front end or in the DBX generator. Since the DWARF-2 generators do something reasonable, AFAICT, I would guess the problem is in either the DBX generator, or the GDB reader for STABS, or in the STABS format itself. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23190