------- Additional Comments From c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de 2005-08-02 10:14 ------- (In reply to comment #18) > I do apologise for missing this one: My fix for PR16940 fixes this fellow > too. > > I would be grateful if the reporters can give the latest cvs a whirl to > confirm > that this is the case. >
This bug has quietly disappeared from my code as of gcc-20050722. Today's cvs gcc-20050802 is working fine as well. So yes, it seems indeed fixed. Many thanks to everyone involved. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18108
