------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-08-05 03:49 ------- Subject: Re: error: '<anonymous enum>' is/uses anonymous type'
sethml at google dot com wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From sethml at google dot com 2005-08-05 03:43 > ------- > The C++ working group examined this issue in April as core language issue 488: > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#488 > > They tentatively concluded that type deduction should fail in this case, > leaving > the built-in operator==(int,int) version as the only viable candidate and thus > the code attached to this bug report would compile. > > It seems likely that this decision will hold, that the standard will be > clarified, making this code valid. > > Can we get this bug re-opened, and perhaps change GCC 4 to accept this code in > anticipation of the C++ standard changing to explicitly allow it? Our normal practice has been not to do that until the issue is in at least WP status. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20589
