------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-07 
15:52 -------
Index: tree-ssa-math-opts.c 
=================================================================== 
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c,v 
retrieving revision 2.4 
diff -u -p -r2.4 tree-ssa-math-opts.c 
--- tree-ssa-math-opts.c        1 Aug 2005 08:58:25 -0000       2.4 
+++ tree-ssa-math-opts.c        7 Aug 2005 15:52:07 -0000 
@@ -56,14 +56,15 @@ gate_cse_reciprocals (void) 
 
 /* Check if DEF's uses include more than one floating-point division, 
    and if so replace them by multiplications with the reciprocal.  If 
-   PHI is true, insert the reciprocal calculation before BSI, otherwise 
-   insert it after and move BSI to the new statement. 
+   BEFORE_BSI is true, insert the reciprocal calculation before BSI, 
+   otherwise insert it after and move BSI to the new statement. 
 
    Does not check the type of DEF, nor that DEF is a GIMPLE register. 
    This is done in the caller for speed, because otherwise this routine 
    would be called for every definition and phi node.  */ 
 static void 
-execute_cse_reciprocals_1 (block_stmt_iterator *bsi, tree def, bool phi) 
+execute_cse_reciprocals_1 (block_stmt_iterator *bsi, 
+                          tree def, bool before_bsi) 
 { 
   use_operand_p use_p; 
   imm_use_iterator use_iter; 
@@ -99,7 +100,7 @@ execute_cse_reciprocals_1 (block_stmt_it 
                     fold_build2 (RDIV_EXPR, type, build_real (type, dconst1), 
                                  def)); 
 
-  if (phi) 
+  if (before_bsi) 
     bsi_insert_before (bsi, new_stmt, BSI_SAME_STMT); 
   else 
     bsi_insert_after (bsi, new_stmt, BSI_NEW_STMT); 
@@ -133,7 +134,7 @@ execute_cse_reciprocals (void) 
        { 
          block_stmt_iterator bsi; 
          bsi = bsi_start (single_succ (ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR)); 
-          execute_cse_reciprocals_1 (&bsi, default_def (arg), false); 
+          execute_cse_reciprocals_1 (&bsi, default_def (arg), true); 
        } 
 
   FOR_EACH_BB (bb) 
 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23234

Reply via email to