------- Additional Comments From matz at suse dot de 2005-08-11 16:13 ------- I don't think this is actually fixed in reload1.c. Perhaps it is hidden by other changes, so that the particular miscompilation doesn't happen anymore, but even HEAD reload1.c contains the questionable double counting of inherited operands. Might be with enough work (perhaps by disabling some tree-ssa passes, but retaining -O1) we can still make it fail with mainline.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15265
