------- Additional Comments From adah at netstd dot com 2005-08-12 02:10 ------- (In reply to comment #79) > Subject: Re: can't compile self defined void distance(std::vector<T>, std::vector<T>) > "adah at netstd dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > Furthermore, and more importantly, GCC bugzilla is the not the place > | > to record UNEXPECTED or PROBLEM with the C++ standard. > | > | Is it a guideline of GCC Bugzilla that a PRoblem owing to the C++ Standard is > | never considered a PRoblem at all? > > Ahem. Can you read?
Show an official page. > | If it is, please show me where I can read it. > I'm very willing to do so if you provide evidence that you can read. The only thing I can say is that you are an absolutely incurably rude person. > | should be output. If this function is in some namespace and the original > | function call is not qualified, then an additional warning on argument- > | dependent lookup should be emitted. > | > | Simple rules. I do not think it is magic. > Surely, your rules do not require magic. They just appear nonsensical to > me. As argument dependent name lookup has become an essential part of > C++ libraries, begining the standard one. I do not invalidate ADL. Just that ADL is causing problems, and some diagnostic messages (only when problems occur) can help people encountering these problems identify their problems. Not only I am saying that ADL is causing unwanted problems. I do not think Herb Sutter's opinion that the OP's program *should* compile is less authentic than yours. > | No. If I put it simply, then this behaviour violates the rationale of > | namespaces. > Which rationale? Name separation. People can use names freely (in their own namespace or the global namespace) without worrying that the name is used in another namespace. > | This is not the behaviour I am currently requesting. I just wanted to told > | Wolfgang there is a third way to `fix' the problem which I prefer better than > | his suggestions. > Essentially, you're here just to argue. I am afraid that it is YOU that are here to argue, and to *flame*. > -- Gaby Yongwei -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15910
