------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-23 11:16 ------- I don't think this is inefficient at all for the pentium Pro and above because they don't like the complex instructions as the older processors do.
And if you want to optimize for size (which gets what you want) use -Os:
pushl cp_pipe
call close
pushl cp_pipe+4
call close
popl %eax
movl $0, waiting_for_initial_map
popl %edx
ret
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23525
