------- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-23 14:51 ------- > It looks like the problem is that we don't remove the synchronization > for nextDouble() even though the test case is single-threaded.
If we can remove even only half of the synchronization overhead, by synchronizing just once per nextDouble() call, it's a win. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23283
