jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:- > > ------- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-26 > 15:57 ------- > This got broken by the libcpp/files.c part of > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg00272.html > My understanding of the change was that this was just a performance > improvement. > The question is if that change is fixable to handle this and keep the > improvements where they can be used, or if it should be reverted.
I would back it out; I suspect the perceived performance improvement came from missing some cases like these. IMO the code was already quite efficient. Neil.
