------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-09-09 
06:22 -------
Subject: Bug 21104

CVSROOT:        /cvs/gcc
Module name:    gcc
Changes by:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]       2005-09-09 06:22:29

Modified files:
        gcc/fortran    : ChangeLog trans.h trans-array.h trans-array.c 
                         trans-expr.c 
        gcc/testsuite  : ChangeLog 
Added files:
        gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg: array_alloc_1.f90 array_alloc_2.f90 
                                   array_alloc_3.f90 

Log message:
        PR fortran/21104
        * trans.h (gfc_interface_sym_mapping, gfc_interface_mapping): Moved
        from trans-expr.c.
        (gfc_init_interface_mapping, gfc_free_interface_mapping)
        (gfc_add_interface_mapping, gfc_finish_interface_mapping)
        (gfc_apply_interface_mapping): Declare.
        * trans-array.h (gfc_set_loop_bounds_from_array_spec): Declare.
        (gfc_trans_allocate_temp_array): Add pre and post block arguments.
        * trans-array.c (gfc_set_loop_bounds_from_array_spec): New function.
        (gfc_trans_allocate_array_storage): Replace loop argument with
        separate pre and post blocks.
        (gfc_trans_allocate_temp_array): Add pre and post block arguments.
        Update call to gfc_trans_allocate_array_storage.
        (gfc_trans_array_constructor, gfc_conv_loop_setup): Adjust for new
        interface to gfc_trans_allocate_temp_array.
        * trans-expr.c (gfc_interface_sym_mapping, gfc_interface_mapping):
        Moved to trans.h.
        (gfc_init_interface_mapping, gfc_free_interface_mapping)
        (gfc_add_interface_mapping, gfc_finish_interface_mapping)
        (gfc_apply_interface_mapping): Make extern.
        (gfc_conv_function_call): Build an interface mapping for array
        return values too.  Call gfc_set_loop_bounds_from_array_spec.
        Adjust call to gfc_trans_allocate_temp_array so that code is
        added to SE rather than LOOP.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.545&r2=1.546
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.33&r2=1.34
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.13&r2=1.14
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.58&r2=1.59
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.61&r2=1.62
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.6036&r2=1.6037
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_alloc_1.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_alloc_2.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_alloc_3.f90.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21104

Reply via email to