------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-09-12 10:08 ------- The problem is that the gimplifier always want the index field of the constructor element to be filled. If you fix that in the obvious way (so that "no index" means "previous index + 1"), it should be quite easy to fix, for C++. In C, I have no clue how this interacts with designated initializers though.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12245
