------- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-13 08:34 ------- After the patch for 18899, this now works for:
program main implicit none real :: a(0:9) integer :: bn(10) bn(1:1) = lbound(a) print *, bn(1) end program main but like FX says, we probably ought to report an error for the mismatch in the original testcase. Reclassifying as a missing diagnostic bug. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |NEW Keywords|wrong-code |accepts-invalid Last reconfirmed|2005-05-08 17:28:58 |2005-09-13 08:34:24 date| | Summary|wrong result for lbound with|missing error for |single argument |incompatible array | |assignment involving lbound http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18315