------- Additional Comments From ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-22
19:20 -------
The better way to fix this IMHO is to mirror how we fixed other conditionally
missing symbols. Add a _DYNAMIC hook, add the support guards in various places
where the HAVE_X guards exist, add a correctly written define in os_defines.h to
describe the OS-level macro used to key the visibility of the "standard"
function or other symbol. See the current FreeBSD os_defines.h for some
examples.
In my further opinion, this is merely a QoI issue (granted, annoying): The user
defining a macro in implementor space may get this type of result.
Regards,
Loren
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-09-22 19:20:40
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24012
