------- Comment #1 from jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi 2005-10-03 09:39 ------- Ah, yes. Also see PR22519 and PR23419. Which way do we want it for unformatted? Should kind=10 use 10 bytes of storage or should it use whatever the padded size is? I would prefer the padded size, as otherwise we take a x10 speed hit when doing array IO.
But anyway, I'm pretty sure this bug is because the size in the array descriptor is 12, since real(10) is padded to 12 bytes, right? Oh, how much simpler life would be without padding. I think it would be quite simple to kludge over this bug in the library, but if we want a real solution, as in splitting the kind=size relationship I think more work is needed. I'll take a look tonight. -- jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |22519 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24174