------- Comment #1 from jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi 2005-10-03 09:39 -------
Ah, yes. Also see PR22519 and PR23419. Which way do we want it for unformatted?
Should kind=10 use 10 bytes of storage or should it use whatever the padded
size is? I would prefer the padded size, as otherwise we take a x10 speed hit
when doing array IO.
But anyway, I'm pretty sure this bug is because the size in the array
descriptor is 12, since real(10) is padded to 12 bytes, right? Oh, how much
simpler life would be without padding.
I think it would be quite simple to kludge over this bug in the library, but if
we want a real solution, as in splitting the kind=size relationship I think
more work is needed.
I'll take a look tonight.
--
jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |22519
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24174
