------- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-16 22:06 ------- The new switch2.C test is failing for me. In fact, I'm not sure why we should see overflow warnings on these expressions; isn't "0x80000000" INT_MIN? In that case, INT_MIN + 1 does not overflow, does it? The C front end in GCC 3.4.x does not warn about the equivalent C program.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22551
