------- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-18 12:34 
-------
Subject: Bug 23118

CVSROOT:        /cvs/gcc
Module name:    gcc
Branch:         gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]      2005-10-18 12:34:30

Modified files:
        gcc/cp         : ChangeLog cp-tree.h class.c semantics.c 
        gcc/testsuite  : ChangeLog 
Added files:
        gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/overload: error2.C 
        gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/inherit: covariant14.C 

Log message:
        cp:
        PR c++/22604
        * class.c (update_vtable_entry_for_fn): Don't process invalid
        covariant overriders.

        PR c++/23118
        * cp-tree.h (add_method): Add return value.
        * class.c (add_method): Return success indicator.
        * semantics.c (finish_member_declaration): Don't add an invalid
        method to the method list.
        testsuite:
        PR c++/23118
        * g++.dg/overload/error2.C: New.

        PR c++/22604
        * g++.dg/inherit/covariant14.C: New.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.4648.2.142&r2=1.4648.2.143
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.1106.2.17&r2=1.1106.2.18
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/class.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.707.2.8&r2=1.707.2.9
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/semantics.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.463.2.12&r2=1.463.2.13
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.5084.2.466&r2=1.5084.2.467
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/overload/error2.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/inherit/covariant14.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23118

Reply via email to