------- Comment #8 from dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2005-10-27 16:43 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Could the dear reported at least try to provide a small test case?
The testcase in the attachment contains only a 4 lines function: HandleDeIconify, the rest is just fluff to allow it to compile. Granted a lot of it can be pruned, but I don't think it stops trying to debug the problem. > I think this should not be marked as a regression. Why not? It is a regression. > It's just sad that this > kind of non-bug keeps the regression count high, when in reality GCC 4.1 > produces smaller code overall. PR23153 tells a completely different story about codesize (at least for i686). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23524