------- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 04:43
-------
I think we should look for some solution to this problem, without reverting the
previous patch. If this problem is amenable to a peephole, let's solve it that
way.
That said, I'm going to downgrade this to P4; if we can't fix it for 4.1, we'll
look again for 4.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23302
