------- Comment #12 from arun dot sharma at google dot com 2005-11-08 01:30 ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Yes and the ones against gcc are only about eplogue or prologue so it should > > not matter for what you are doing. > > PR 18748 and PR 18749 both are about prologue and eplogue code which should > not > matter with the backtrace at all. >
ok, will try to root cause our problems with libunwind (they show up as bad pointer dereferences in libunwind) and get back to you. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24724
