------- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 16:47 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Certainly, the test-case in Comment #1 does depend on libstdc++ at all. > Let's fix this.
The testcase in comment #1 shows the issue with what libstdc++ is doing. Since complex is scalers they cannot be (with defined behavior) constructed by parts. So the testcase in comment #1 is in fact invalid with respect of the warning. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23497
