------- Comment #8 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-11-16 20:39 ------- Subject: Re: COMPLEX_ASSIGN is wrong
"pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] | > Subject: Re: COMPLEX_ASSIGN is wrong | > | > "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | I should also note that: | > | http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Complex.html#Complex | > | | > | recomends against using the extensions anyways. | > | > Exactly which sentence says so? | | "you should use the ISO C99 function" every time it mentions the | extenstions. (1) that is not the same as recommending against the extension; (2) how do you use ISO C99 functions to implement C99 <complex.h>, C++98 <complex> that interoperate with C99 _Complex and other libraries that predate C99 functions or on plateforms where C99 functions don't exist but the libraries need to be implemented anyway? -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24902
