------- Comment #22 from thebohemian at gmx dot net 2005-11-17 12:39 -------
Created an attachment (id=10262)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10262&action=view)
lazy linking - part 2
This is the same patch as above but corrects the behavior in case that the
static field of a missing class is touched.
Anyway I missed setting the JV_CONSTANTS_Resolved flag after the creation of
the phantom class and had to add special handling for the case that the owner
of a field is such a phantom class (-> throw NoClassDefFoundError, as always ;)
)
--
thebohemian at gmx dot net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #10255|0 |1
is obsolete| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24616
