------- Comment #3 from barbieri at gmail dot com 2005-11-18 18:36 ------- Created an attachment (id=10276) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10276&action=view) gcc-lower_function_body.patch
Alternative patch that also fix seg fault, but earlier. It's uglier than the previous, and is more restricted, since it just protect the behaviour from gimple-low.c:lower_function_body(), while the previous patch does the check for every use of annotate_with_file_line, used by SET_EXPR_LOCATION. I cannot know if this is a bug in the middle-end, since there is no documentation on when I need to set this value. If so, probably we can use gcc_assert() to confirm this? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24932
