------- Comment #6 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 02:09 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I've made a small amount of headway on this. > > Labels L22 and L21 were (when created) the addresses of objects in the code. > However, they are deleted (presumably as unreachable), but the references to > the > lables persist. > > This is presumably exactly the case that RTH believed couldn't happen when he > mentioned this in his email here: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-05/msg00881.html > > and the reason we don't abort on ARM is that we never call > output_constant_pool > since we roll our own mini-pools. > > I've sofar been unsuccessful in reducing the testcase to something more > managable.
Have you been able to track this with RTH? Do you care about this bug be fixed for 3.4.5? We're in 3.4.6 pre-release business now. -- Gaby -- gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org, | |gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15231