------- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 09:11 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > conjga = conj(*pa); > or > conjga = conjl(*pa); > or > conjga = conjf(*pa);
I'm ready to do that, but since complex numbers in C are always a pain, I want to know: are we sure that conj/conjf/conjl are *always* available? I mean, are they part of the things gcc provides even if there is no library support for them in the runtime libm? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24903
