------- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-25 22:38 ------- No, this isn't a failure of the demangler. Nor do ever expect these functions to ever be demangled. That they contain the original function name at all is merely an aid to us the compiler developer.
I don't see that this is any better or worse, from the user's perspective, than just "__omp_fn.N", which is what we had before the patch. Unless you can come up with some convincing user usage scenario, I'm not going to address this problem at all. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25015
