------- Comment #14 from igodard at pacbell dot net 2005-12-01 00:06 -------
Two bugs:
1) diagnostic, about location of deprecated files
2) constructor as non-const lvalue, where using a constructor as left-operand
of
"<<" produces screwey output.
I'm concerned about the second. I can write:
foo& f = foo();
so the constructor is yielding non-const. I can pass the constructor to a
function:
void bar(foo& f){}; bar(foo());
So why can't I pass a constructor to operator<< and get the correct output?
Emitting a diagnostic for this usage makes no sense to me.
Ivan
Ivan
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9925
