------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-02 19:01 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > We are trying to keep the libstc++ code as clean and representative of > standards-conforming C++ code as possible, and have avoided __try, __catch, > etc. or other uglification in favor of the actual C++ terms, ie try, catch. > > I'd rather you work around this in objective-c or objective c++.
Actaully I can think of why this cannot be worked around, first try is the keyword and not just @try. I personally would like this fixed in libstdc++ as it is changing valid code in people's sources without them knowing it is happening to them (maybe an #undef before the end of the header files will fix the issue). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25191
