------- Comment #23 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-15 00:00 ------- lreg decides to do this: ;; Register 95 in 25. ;; Register 97 in 28. ;; Register 99 in 22. ;; Register 102 in 21. ;; Register 104 in 25. ;; Register 111 in 28. ;; Register 112 in 19. ;; Register 113 in 28.
and reload/greg agree (note the missing page breaks in the .greg dump btw): ;; Register dispositions: 95 in 25 97 in 28 99 in 22 102 in 21 104 in 25 111 in 28 112 in 19 113 in 28 So reg 95 and reg 104 are indeed assigned the same hard register. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23837
