------- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-30 15:19 -------
An easy question for a change! No, I had committed the patch but had to remove
it because it broke things in ways that I could not handle, whilst we had house
guests.
2005-12-24 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/25029
PR fortran/21256
* resolve.c (check_assumed_size_reference,
resolve_assumed_size_actual):
Remove because of regressions caused by patch.
(resolve_function, resolve_call, resolve_variable): Remove assumed size
checks because of regressionscaused by patch.
The upgraded version is regtesting, as I write. I am going to add Toon's
testcase and to make absolutely sure, this time, that all the intrinsics behave
correctly. I should be submitting tomorrow morning.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25029
