------- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-12-30 15:19 -------
An easy question for a change!  No, I had committed the patch but had to remove
it because it broke things in ways that I could not handle, whilst we had house
guests.

2005-12-24  Paul Thomas  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        PR fortran/25029
        PR fortran/21256
        * resolve.c (check_assumed_size_reference,
resolve_assumed_size_actual):
        Remove because of regressions caused by patch.
        (resolve_function, resolve_call, resolve_variable): Remove assumed size
        checks because of regressionscaused by patch.

The upgraded version is regtesting, as I write.  I am going to add Toon's
testcase and to make absolutely sure, this time, that all the intrinsics behave
correctly.  I should be submitting tomorrow morning.

Paul


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25029

Reply via email to