------- Comment #4 from drepper at redhat dot com 2005-12-30 23:06 ------- No, it's *NOT* undefined. The libc interface decides what is defined and what is not and it is *EXPLICITLY* documented that NULL pointers are printed as (null).
The standard might leave it undefined but this does *NOT* mean the implementation cannot define it. -- drepper at redhat dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25609