------- Comment #7 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-01-03 23:01 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with const int copied into two different functions
rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #6 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-03 22:40 > ------- > Patch: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg00136.html This patch is not OK, but it's close. We should not call unshare_expr on DECL_INITIAL until after the mark_used call, as static data members in templates will not have proper initializers until after that point. Also, there's no need to unshare *before* calling fold_non_dependent_expr. In fact, there's no need to unshare before the return statement at the end of the function. That will avoid creating trees that will only be thrown away later. So, why not just do: return unshare_expr (decl); at the end of the function? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25632