------- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-01-04 15:17 ------- (In reply to comment #5)
> Hmm, if I understood correctly, this means that the variable is not set if the > reading operation fails. That sounds plausible, and in this case the warning > is > perfectly OK and should not be suppressed. I had never thought of that ... Totally correct. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25649
