------- Comment #4 from law at redhat dot com 2006-01-24 22:12 ------- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] ACATS ICE cxac0004 in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:161 on x86-linux
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 21:00 +0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: Weird. I've got a little hack to reject the ranges given by SCEV when they're going to be invalid. That "fixes" cxac004, but causes c99004a to fail! I wish I could say I understand why, but I don't. jeff -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25900