------- Comment #4 from law at redhat dot com  2006-01-24 22:12 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] ACATS ICE cxac0004 in
        set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:161 on x86-linux

On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 21:00 +0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Weird.

I've got a little hack to reject the ranges given by SCEV when they're
going to be invalid.

That "fixes" cxac004, but causes c99004a to fail!

I wish I could say I understand why, but I don't.

jeff


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25900

Reply via email to