------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-26 17:43 ------- Confirmed, very much related to PR 25977. Though I think this and PR 25977 are almost the same bug as we get: TARGET_EXPR <D.3014, <<< Unknown tree: aggr_init_expr operator+ 3, (struct A &) (struct A *) &a1 D.3014 >>>
We are losing some piece of information. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |25977 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords| |wrong-code Known to fail| |4.0.3 4.1.0 4.2.0 Known to work| |3.4.0 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-01-26 17:43:24 date| | Summary|incorrect codegen for |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] |conditional |incorrect codegen for | |conditional [SVO issue] Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25979