------- Comment #7 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2006-01-27 02:43 ------- Subject: Re: return from funcrtion of void value allowed
"yuri at tsoft dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | For templates it's sufficient to treat void as type in template | specializations. | No need to further change language. G++ implements the language as defined by the ISO committee. This is not a GNU C++ extension. | Especially because generic programming doesn't really scale much beyond it's | 'local' use like in STL. you're entitled to your opinion. Let's close this PR as we do not have place for trolls. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25986
