------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-05 03:55 -------
The patch I am testing right now:
Index: tree-cfg.c
===================================================================
--- tree-cfg.c (revision 110536)
+++ tree-cfg.c (working copy)
@@ -1108,7 +1108,8 @@ cleanup_dead_labels (void)
for_each_eh_region (update_eh_label);
/* Finally, purge dead labels. All user-defined labels and labels that
- can be the target of non-local gotos are preserved. */
+ can be the target of non-local gotos and labels which have their
+ address taken are preserved. */
FOR_EACH_BB (bb)
{
block_stmt_iterator i;
@@ -1128,7 +1129,8 @@ cleanup_dead_labels (void)
if (label == label_for_this_bb
|| ! DECL_ARTIFICIAL (label)
- || DECL_NONLOCAL (label))
+ || DECL_NONLOCAL (label)
+ || FORCED_LABEL (label))
bsi_next (&i);
else
bsi_remove (&i, true);
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25251
