------- Comment #8 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-14 18:30 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Working on a patch. > Fixing this issue has a deep "type" implications on the way we currently > hand inputs with erronous types whereas trying to progress as much as > possible. > Are you still working on this? If this is too hard to handle exactly, could we instead do something similar to 3.3, i.e. instead of 'int' we say non-void type or integer type?
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25156
