------- Comment #8 from walter dot zimmer at dlr dot de 2006-02-16 15:28 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Here is a newer patch which fixes it: I didn't look (or even understand) what the patch does, but I can contribute empirical evidence that the following construct:
SUBROUTINE FOO (N, AB) INTEGER N DOUBLE PRECISION AB(N, *) AB(5,5) = 0.0 does not trigger the Array out-of-bounds-condition any more in our code. Therefore we are glad to have this fix! Tested on gcc-4.1-20060210 x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -- walter dot zimmer at dlr dot de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |walter dot zimmer at dlr dot | |de http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19777