------- Comment #8 from walter dot zimmer at dlr dot de 2006-02-16 15:28
-------
(In reply to comment #6)
> Here is a newer patch which fixes it:
I didn't look (or even understand) what the patch does, but I can contribute
empirical evidence that the following construct:
SUBROUTINE FOO (N, AB)
INTEGER N
DOUBLE PRECISION AB(N, *)
AB(5,5) = 0.0
does not trigger the Array out-of-bounds-condition any more in our code.
Therefore we are glad to have this fix!
Tested on gcc-4.1-20060210 x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--
walter dot zimmer at dlr dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |walter dot zimmer at dlr dot
| |de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19777
