------- Comment #11 from law at redhat dot com 2006-03-06 17:21 -------
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] three testsuite
failures in gcc.dg/tree-ssa/
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 17:10 +0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> ------- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-06 17:10
> -------
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > As I've mentioned at least 3 times now, the Ada mis-compilations
> > have priority. I'm working on these between fixing Ada issues.
> > When there's status worth mentioning, I'll certainly add the
> > status to his PR. Until then, bugging me about it isn't
> > helping.
>
> These are older regressions than the Ada regressions and they show up as
> testsuite failures and also it has been 3 weeks since this has been reported
> enough time to fix them, yes it might be a minor regression to you but it is
> an
> annoying regression to the people who are testing their patches as they see
> the
> fails and think it was their patch (this has already happened with these
> testsuite failures already, see PR 26406).
They are minor performance related regressions. The Ada
regresions are incorrect code. The Ada regressions have priority.
You're not helping here. As I've said before, be patient. The
problems will be addressed. The more you bug me the longer this
process takes. When there's something worth reporting, I'll
report it.
Jeff
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26344
