------- Comment #5 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-03-08 15:26 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I did come on a bit strong, didn't I? Sorry about that, I'm just a bit > frustrated since it used to work better in the gcc 3 series :-)
Oh, don't worry. I put a smiley to my remark, just in case you didn't notice :-) > Do you have a suggestion as to where I could continue this discussion? There's pretty much only a single route for you, and that is through the relevant C++ standards committees. A pretty daunting task, if you ask me. W. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26448