------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-12 21:45 -------
Your benchmark is bad news as one rand is not a good randomizer for the lower
bits, oh after 127, the condition for your benchmark becomes always true which
is why it gets slower again.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Optimization flaw on |Optimization flaw on
|conditional set of a bit. |conditionnal set of a bit.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26656
