------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-12 21:45 ------- Your benchmark is bad news as one rand is not a good randomizer for the lower bits, oh after 127, the condition for your benchmark becomes always true which is why it gets slower again.
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Optimization flaw on |Optimization flaw on |conditional set of a bit. |conditionnal set of a bit. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26656