------- Comment #2 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2006-03-31 03:01 ------- Subject: Re: Can't compile a 64-bit gcc
I don't know. Why does 4.2 use libiconv and 4.1 not use it? (I'm presuming that 4.1 doesn't use it because I was able to build a 64-bit gcc on darwin). Should gcc ship libiconv source and compile it using BOOTCFLAGS, like it ends up doing with libiberty? Brad -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26892
