------- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-05 07:25
-------
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > I don't think this is defined code:
> > if (present (a)) call abort ()
> > call foo_ (a)
> > If a is not present, you should not be able to use a in any way.
>
> Not quite; as I recorded in PR26891 (fixed in trunk and to be fixed in 4.1
> tomorrow)
I had missed that :).
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26891 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27035
